Hygienic assessment of new pesticides translocation in “soil – plant” system

Summary. Assessment and risk minimization of the harmful effects of pesticides on public health is an important task of preventive medicine. In particular, the study of the migration of new pesticides in the “soil-plant” system is relevant because of the leading role of the oral route of their entry into the human body. The aim of the work – to establish the translocation patterns from soil to agricultural crops with new pesticides such as triazolone, amicarbazone, triketone, and bicyclopyroned carboxamide fungicide pydiflumetofen. Materials and Methods. Mathematical modeling of the studied pesticide migration in the "soil-plant" system was carried out using regression equations. They describe the dependence between the maximum permissible concentration (MPC) of a substance in soil and its maximum residue limit (MRL) in food products of plant origin (stage I).  The translocation of amicarbazone, bicyclopyrone and pydiflumetofen in the “soil-plant” system was studied in three series of laboratory hygiene experiments (stage II). Content determination of the studied substances in the green mass of bread grains and vegetable crops was carried out by the method of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results. The concentrations of: amicarbazone – 0.2 mg/kg, bicyclopyrone – 0.25 mg/kg, and pydiflumetofen. – 0.12 mg/kg were recognized as threshold concentrations in soil according to the translocation indicator of harmfulness. They are formed in soil arable layer when applying the studied pesticides, respectively, in 4, 5, and 2 maximum rates of consumption. At these concentrations, the content of substances in the green mass of all phyto test plants does not exceed the hygienically significant level of 0.02 mg/kg,  0.02 mg/kg, and 0.01 mg/kg, therefore. Comparing the results of the I and II stages of the study, it was established that the experimentally determined threshold concentration of amicarbazone in soil coincided with the result of mathematical modeling; of bicyclopyrone – slightly (by 39 %)  exceeded the calculated result; of pydiflumetofen – 2.4 times higher than the calculated value. Conclusions. It was established that the migration of amicarbazone, bicyclopyrone and pydiflumetofen from the soil will not exceed their hygienically significant level in plants when their content in soil is accordingly 0.2 mg/kg;  0.25 mg/kg; 0.12 mg/kg and below. The method of mathematical modeling of translocation demonstrated sufficient prognostic ability concerning all 3 researched pesticides. The obtained results were used in the substantiation of MPCs of amicarbazone, bicyclopyrone and pydiflumetofen in soil

pesticides, phytotoxicity, plants, soil, migration, threshold concentration

https://doi.org/10.11603/bmbr.2706-6290.2022.4.13261

[1] Marvin J. Levine. Pesticides: A toxic time bomb in our midst. Westport, Connecticut, London; 2007.

[2] Methodology of predicting the leading link of pesticides migration in the environment. Kyiv. 2022;7. [Information Letter No 13/2 – 2022 on the Innovations in the System of Public Health]. Ukrainian.

[3] Martіianova YV, Korshun MM. [Prediction of danger degree  of  soil  contamination,  underground  and  surface water sources by pesticides of different chemical classes depending on soil type and climatic conditions]. Ukrainsky inaukovyi medychnyi molodizhnyi zhurnal. 2021;124(2):77-88. DOI: 10.32345/USMYJ.2(124).2021.77-88. Ukrainian.

[4]Public release summary on the evaluation of pydiflumetofenin the product Miravis Fungicide.  2018. P.58.  URL: https://apvma.gov.au/sites/default/ files/publica-tion/29011-pydiflumetofen_draft_prs-final_.pdf.
[5]Public release summary on the evaluation of the new product Amitron 700WGHerbicide // Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority. 2018. URL:https://apvma.gov.au/sites/default/files/  publication/29506-amitron_700wg_herbicide _prs.pdf

[6]Public  release  summary  on  the  evaluation  of  the new  active  bicyclopyrone  in  the  product  Talinor  Herbi-cide.  2017.URL:  https://apvma.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication/26736-prs-bicyclopyrone-talinor-herbicide.pdfAPRIL 201.

[7] Methodological  recommendations  for  hygienic  substantiation  of  MPC  of  chemical  substances  in  soil.MRNo. 2609–82. 1982(57):1.

[8] Methodical directionson the hygienicassessment of new pesticides: MDNo. 4263-87. Кyiv. 1988;210. Russian.

[9]Methodology for the сalculation hygienic standardization of the pesticides in soil. Kyiv. 2005;2. [Information Letter No. 131-2005 on the Innovations in the System of Public Health/Ukrmedpatentinform]. Ukrainian.

[10] Goncharuk EI, Sidorenko GI. Hygienic standardization of the chemical substances in soil: Manual.[Гигиеническое нормирование химических веществ в почве: руководство] Moscow: Meditsina. 1986;320. Russian.

[11] Korshun OM, Lipavska AO, Martіianova YV, Ruda TV. Methodological  guidelines  for  the  determination  of amicarbazone  (as  the  sum  of  amicarbazone  and  its metabolites)  in  corn  grain  bythemethodofhigh  perfor-manceliquidchromatography, No. 1527-2018. Кyiv: Minist-try  of  Ecology  and  Nature  Resources  of  Ukraine.  Order No. 246 of July 06, 2018. Ukrainian.

[12]Milakhov DS, Korshun OM, Lipavska AO,Martіianova YV, Avramchuk AO. Methodological guidelines for the determination of bicyclopyrone in corn grain by the method of high performance liquid chromatography,No.1743-2021. Кyiv: Ministry of Environmental and Natural Resources Protection, Order No. 576 of September 06, 2021. Ukrainian.

[13]Korshun OM, Lipavska AO,  Martіianova  YV, Yastrub AM, Avramchuk AO. Methodological guidelines for the determination  of pydiflumetofen (adepidynТМ)  in  cabbage by the method of high-performance liquid chromatography,No 1709-2020. Kyiv: Ministry of Environmental and Natural Resources Protection, Order No. 212 of October 27, 2020. Ukrainian.

[14]MalhatFM. Bicyclopyrone (295). Central Agricultural Pesticides Laboratory. Giza, Egypt, 2017. URL: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/  Pests_Pesticides/JMPR/Evaluation2017/BICYCLOPYRONE__295_.pdf.